In re Wright
This text of 333 F. App'x 767 (In re Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished by PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Victor Wardell Wright petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling the United States to respond to his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2006). Because the United States filed the response on June 4, 2009, we conclude that Wright’s petition is moot. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
333 F. App'x 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wright-ca4-2009.