In re Wrenn
This text of 921 F.2d 1342 (In re Wrenn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING WITH SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC
The pro se petitioner’s petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc were submitted to this Court. As no member of this Court or the panel requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing in banc, and
As the panel considered the petition for rehearing and is of the opinion that it should be denied,
IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc are denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion to supplement his petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
921 F.2d 1342, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22971, 1990 WL 254999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wrenn-ca4-1990.