In re Wrenn

Fourth Circuit

In re Wrenn

921 F.2d 1342, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22971, 1990 WL 254999

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 23, 1990·No. No. 90-1043·Published

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING WITH SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC

The pro se petitioner’s petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc were submitted to this Court. As no member of this Court or the panel requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing in banc, and

As the panel considered the petition for rehearing and is of the opinion that it should be denied,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc are denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion to supplement his petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING WITH SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC

The pro se petitioner’s petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc were submitted to this Court. As no member of this Court or the panel requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing in banc, and

As the panel considered the petition for rehearing and is of the opinion that it should be denied,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc are denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion to supplement his petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc is granted.

In re Wrenn, 921 F.2d 1342, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22971, 1990 WL 254999 (4th Cir. 1990).

Pincite

921 F.2d 1342 (In re Wrenn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.