In re Woronoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Woronoff

265 A.D. 11, 37 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5660

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D. 11 (In re Woronoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Woronoff, 265 A.D. 11, 37 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5660 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

' On February 4, 1935, the respondent was duly convicted in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York of the embezzlement of certain moneys as a committee for an incompetent war veteran in violation of sections 556 and 716 of title 38 of the United States Code. Said crimes are felonies. Pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 88 and section 477 of the Judiciary Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 30), therefore, he must be disbarred.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

' On February 4, 1935, the respondent was duly convicted in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York of the embezzlement of certain moneys as a committee for an incompetent war veteran in violation of sections 556 and 716 of title 38 of the United States Code. Said crimes are felonies. Pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 88 and section 477 of the Judiciary Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 30), therefore, he must be disbarred.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D. 11, 37 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-woronoff-nyappdiv-1942.