In re Work

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

In re Work

30 F. Cas. 624, 30 Leg. Int. 361, 1873 U.S. App. LEXIS 1808

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania·Decided May 12, 1873·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The court, after consideration by

McKENNA, Circuit Judge,

delivered a verbal opinion, and directed the entry of the following decree. “And now, May 12th, 1873, the de[625]*625murrer and bill of review having been argued by counsel pro and con, and duly considered by the court, the demurrer is overruled and the decree of the district court is reversed as to Edward Rahm, Samuel Work, and William McCouch.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court, after consideration by

McKENNA, Circuit Judge,

delivered a verbal opinion, and directed the entry of the following decree. “And now, May 12th, 1873, the de[625]*625murrer and bill of review having been argued by counsel pro and con, and duly considered by the court, the demurrer is overruled and the decree of the district court is reversed as to Edward Rahm, Samuel Work, and William McCouch.

In re Work, 30 F. Cas. 624, 30 Leg. Int. 361, 1873 U.S. App. LEXIS 1808 (circtwdpa 1873).

Pincite

30 F. Cas. 624 (In re Work) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related