In re Work

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

In re Work

30 F. Cas. 624, 30 Leg. Int. 361, 1873 U.S. App. LEXIS 1808

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 12, 1873

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 F. Cas. 624 (In re Work) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Work, 30 F. Cas. 624, 30 Leg. Int. 361, 1873 U.S. App. LEXIS 1808 (circtwdpa 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

The court, after consideration by

McKENNA, Circuit Judge,

delivered a verbal opinion, and directed the entry of the following decree. “And now, May 12th, 1873, the de[625]*625murrer and bill of review having been argued by counsel pro and con, and duly considered by the court, the demurrer is overruled and the decree of the district court is reversed as to Edward Rahm, Samuel Work, and William McCouch.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court, after consideration by

McKENNA, Circuit Judge,

delivered a verbal opinion, and directed the entry of the following decree. “And now, May 12th, 1873, the de[625]*625murrer and bill of review having been argued by counsel pro and con, and duly considered by the court, the demurrer is overruled and the decree of the district court is reversed as to Edward Rahm, Samuel Work, and William McCouch.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 F. Cas. 624, 30 Leg. Int. 361, 1873 U.S. App. LEXIS 1808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-work-circtwdpa-1873.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack