In re Wooster

New York Court of Common Pleas

In re Wooster

10 Daly 6

New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided July 1, 1878·Published

Opinion

Van Hoesen, J.

The amount of the claim which the assignee seeks to compound is small, and a reference to inquire into the circumstances would doubtless cost more than the sum which would be received on the composition. Whilst I shall, in view of the small amount involved, sign the order, I call attention to the fact that the petition is on information and [7] belief merely, and that the name of the informant and the reason why the affidavit is not made by him, are not stated, Mor is any other evidence produced to support the petition.

Application granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Hoesen, J.

The amount of the claim which the assignee seeks to compound is small, and a reference to inquire into the circumstances would doubtless cost more than the sum which would be received on the composition. Whilst I shall, in view of the small amount involved, sign the order, I call attention to the fact that the petition is on information and [7] belief merely, and that the name of the informant and the reason why the affidavit is not made by him, are not stated, Mor is any other evidence produced to support the petition.

Application granted.

In re Wooster, 10 Daly 6 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1878).

Pincite

10 Daly 6 (In re Wooster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.