In re Woody

Fourth Circuit

In re Woody

228 F. App'x 368

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 1, 2007·No. No. 07-6416·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Andre Lamar Woody petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for reconsideration. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act and permission to file his petition in forma pauperis. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant Woody’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Andre Lamar Woody petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for reconsideration. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act and permission to file his petition in forma pauperis. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant Woody’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Woody, 228 F. App'x 368 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

228 F. App'x 368 (In re Woody) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.