In re Woods

California Supreme Court

In re Woods

161 Cal. 238

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 20, 1911

DocketCrim. No. 1710

StatusPublished

This text of 161 Cal. 238 (In re Woods) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Woods, 161 Cal. 238 (Cal. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. The recent amendment of sections 1, 11, and 15 of article VI of the constitution does not abolish the justices courts and other inferior courts which had been previously established by acts of the legislature. They remain in existence with the jurisdiction vested in them by the acts creating them, until the legislature shall, in the exercise of the power given by the section as amended, otherwise provide.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. The recent amendment of sections 1, 11, and 15 of article VI of the constitution does not abolish the justices courts and other inferior courts which had been previously established by acts of the legislature. They remain in existence with the jurisdiction vested in them by the acts creating them, until the legislature shall, in the exercise of the power given by the section as amended, otherwise provide.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 Cal. 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-woods-cal-1911.