In re Woodard

252 A.D.2d 659, 675 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8134
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 2, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 252 A.D.2d 659 (In re Woodard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Woodard, 252 A.D.2d 659, 675 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinions

—Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1980. He maintained a law office in the District of Columbia, where he was also admitted to practice in 1980.

Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moves for an order reciprocally disciplining respondent (see, 22 NYCRR 806.19) by reason of his disbarment by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in 1994. Respondent was disbarred for professional misconduct including repeated acts involving reckless misappropriation of client funds.

Upon this record and having considered all of the papers [660]*660submitted by respondent, we grant petitioner’s motion and further conclude that the interests of justice will be served by imposing upon respondent the same discipline in this State as was imposed in the District of Columbia, namely disbarment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Outman
2022 NY Slip Op 05003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 A.D.2d 659, 675 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-woodard-nyappdiv-1998.