In re Woodard

Fourth Circuit

In re Woodard

223 F. App'x 205

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 2, 2007·No. No. 06-2204·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Woodard, Jr. and Carolyn J. Woodard appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for stay of the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing their Chapter 13 proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. In re: Woodard, Nos. 5:06-mc-0025; 04-04082-8-JRL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2006). We deny the motion for preparation of a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Woodard, Jr. and Carolyn J. Woodard appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for stay of the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing their Chapter 13 proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. In re: Woodard, Nos. 5:06-mc-0025; 04-04082-8-JRL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2006). We deny the motion for preparation of a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

In re Woodard, 223 F. App'x 205 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

223 F. App'x 205 (In re Woodard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.