In re Wood

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Wood

896 A.2d 1167

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 7, 2006

DocketNo. 1096 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 896 A.2d 1167 (In re Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wood, 896 A.2d 1167 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2006, Scott J. Wood having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey for a period of three months by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated July 21, 2005; the said Scott J. Wood having been directed on January 24, 2006, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Scott J. Wood is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of three months, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2006, Scott J. Wood having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey for a period of three months by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated July 21, 2005; the said Scott J. Wood having been directed on January 24, 2006, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Scott J. Wood is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of three months, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

896 A.2d 1167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wood-pa-2006.