In re Wood

S.D. New York

In re Wood

30 F. Cas. 422, 6 Ben. 339

DecidedFebruary 15, 1873

StatusPublished

This text of 30 F. Cas. 422 (In re Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wood, 30 F. Cas. 422, 6 Ben. 339 (S.D.N.Y. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

The amendment asked cannot be granted in the form proposed. The words, “business of his own,” are not found in the act. The motion may be renewed on notice, on an affidavit showing the existence, at the date of filing the petition, of the facts specified in section 11 as necessary to give jurisdiction, setting forth specifically the words proposed to be stricken out and those proposed to be inserted, and the reasons why the petition was not made originally in the proper form, and the reasons why the amendment was not applied for sooner after the filing of the specifications.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

The amendment asked cannot be granted in the form proposed. The words, “business of his own,” are not found in the act. The motion may be renewed on notice, on an affidavit showing the existence, at the date of filing the petition, of the facts specified in section 11 as necessary to give jurisdiction, setting forth specifically the words proposed to be stricken out and those proposed to be inserted, and the reasons why the petition was not made originally in the proper form, and the reasons why the amendment was not applied for sooner after the filing of the specifications.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 F. Cas. 422, 6 Ben. 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wood-nysd-1873.