In re Wonsor
319 N.E.2d 710, 35 N.Y.2d 701, 361 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1305
Opinion
Memorandum. The order appealed from should be affirmed. At the hearing, respondent corroborated rather than contradicted petitioner’s evidence. This posture accounts in part [702] for the present state of the record, which is too sparse and undeveloped to properly present the substantive issue tendered in this unduly delayed appeal.
Chief Judge Bbeitel and Judges Gabbielli, Jones, Wachtleb, Rabin, Stevens and Witmeb
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Wonsor, 319 N.E.2d 710, 35 N.Y.2d 701, 361 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1305 (N.Y. 1974).
319 N.E.2d 710 (In re Wonsor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Richard G.
52 A.D.2d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re Stein
81 Misc. 2d 91 (NYC Family Court, 1975)