Home/New York Court of Appeals/In re Wonsor

In re Wonsor

319 N.E.2d 710, 35 N.Y.2d 701, 361 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1305
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 8, 1974
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 319 N.E.2d 710 (In re Wonsor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Wonsor, 319 N.E.2d 710, 35 N.Y.2d 701, 361 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1305 (N.Y. 1974).

Opinion

Memorandum. The order appealed from should be affirmed. At the hearing, respondent corroborated rather than contradicted petitioner’s evidence. This posture accounts in part [702]*702for the present state of the record, which is too sparse and undeveloped to properly present the substantive issue tendered in this unduly delayed appeal.

Chief Judge Bbeitel and Judges Gabbielli, Jones, Wachtleb, Rabin, Stevens and Witmeb

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Richard G.
52 A.D.2d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re Stein
81 Misc. 2d 91 (NYC Family Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
319 N.E.2d 710, 35 N.Y.2d 701, 361 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wonsor-ny-1974.