In re Wong

Illinois Supreme Court

In re Wong

208 Ill. 2d 572

DecidedMarch 15, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 208 Ill. 2d 572 (In re Wong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wong, 208 Ill. 2d 572 (Ill. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Shirley Leu-Tuan Wong is suspended from the practice of law for six months. Respondent Shirley Leu-Tuan Wong shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from her conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Shirley Leu-Tuan Wong is suspended from the practice of law for six months. Respondent Shirley Leu-Tuan Wong shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from her conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 Ill. 2d 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wong-ill-2004.