In re Wolslagel

N.D. Ohio

In re Wolslagel

104 F. Supp. 68, 41 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1237, 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4264

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio

DecidedApril 4, 1952

DocketNo. 67830

StatusPublished

This text of 104 F. Supp. 68 (In re Wolslagel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wolslagel, 104 F. Supp. 68, 41 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1237, 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4264 (N.D. Ohio 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

McNAMEE, District Judge.

This cause came on this 31st day of March, 1952, to be heard upon the Certificate of Review of the order of the Referee in Bankruptcy, William B. Woods, entered on October 30th, 1951, denying the claim of Thomas M. Carey, Collector of Internal Revenue, except as to the sum of $715.78 for the year 1948, which was allowed as a priority claim;

Also the record before the said Referee, with the Exhibits offered by the parties at said hearing, and the Briefs filed herein by the parties.

Upon due and careful consideration by the Court whereof the Petition to Review is hereby overruled and the Report and Order of the Referee, William B. Woods, is affirmed.

It is adjudged and decreed that the Petition to Review is hereby overruled and the Report and Order of the Referee, William B. Woods, is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McNAMEE, District Judge.

This cause came on this 31st day of March, 1952, to be heard upon the Certificate of Review of the order of the Referee in Bankruptcy, William B. Woods, entered on October 30th, 1951, denying the claim of Thomas M. Carey, Collector of Internal Revenue, except as to the sum of $715.78 for the year 1948, which was allowed as a priority claim;

Also the record before the said Referee, with the Exhibits offered by the parties at said hearing, and the Briefs filed herein by the parties.

Upon due and careful consideration by the Court whereof the Petition to Review is hereby overruled and the Report and Order of the Referee, William B. Woods, is affirmed.

It is adjudged and decreed that the Petition to Review is hereby overruled and the Report and Order of the Referee, William B. Woods, is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 F. Supp. 68, 41 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1237, 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wolslagel-ohnd-1952.