In Re Wolpin

299 N.W. 90, 298 Mich. 313
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 30, 1941
DocketCalendar 41,546
StatusPublished

This text of 299 N.W. 90 (In Re Wolpin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Wolpin, 299 N.W. 90, 298 Mich. 313 (Mich. 1941).

Opinion

, Bushnell, J.

Action on this petition for writ of habeas corpus is controlled by decision in Re Na Lepa, ante, 310.

Theoorder issued by the judge of the recorder’s court must be set aside and vacated and petitioner discharged, but without prejudice to the right of further procedure. In re Smilay, 235 Mich. 151, and In re Gilliland, 284 Mich. 604. It is so ordered. No costs.

Sharpe, C. J., and Boyles, Chandler, North, Starr, Wiest, and Btjxzel, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Smilay
209 N.W. 191 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1926)
In Re Gilliland
280 N.W. 63 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 N.W. 90, 298 Mich. 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wolpin-mich-1941.