In Re Wolpin

299 N.W. 90, 298 Mich. 313
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 30, 1941·No. Calendar 41,546·Published

Opinion

, Bushnell, J.

Action on this petition for writ of habeas corpus is controlled by decision in Re Na Lepa, ante, 310.

Theoorder issued by the judge of the recorder’s court must be set aside and vacated and petitioner discharged, but without prejudice to the right of further procedure. In re Smilay, 235 Mich. 151, and In re Gilliland, 284 Mich. 604. It is so ordered. No costs.

Sharpe, C. J., and Boyles, Chandler, North, Starr, Wiest, and Btjxzel, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Wolpin, 299 N.W. 90, 298 Mich. 313 (Mich. 1941).

299 N.W. 90 (In Re Wolpin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Smilay
209 N.W. 191 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1926)
In Re Gilliland
280 N.W. 63 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1938)