In re Wolfrom

781 N.E.2d 1022, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1415
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 17, 2003
Docket1997-1249
StatusPublished

This text of 781 N.E.2d 1022 (In re Wolfrom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Wolfrom, 781 N.E.2d 1022, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1415 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

IT IS ORDERED by this court, sua sponte, that Carl T. Wolfram, Attorney Registration No. 0019564, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio, be found in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s order of July 11, 1997, to wit, failure to pay publication costs in the amount of $439.65 on or before July 8,1999.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
781 N.E.2d 1022, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wolfrom-ohio-2003.