Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/In re Wolfe

In re Wolfe

784 A.2d 111
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 22, 2001
DocketNo. 693 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 784 A.2d 111 (In re Wolfe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Wolfe, 784 A.2d 111 (Pa. 2001).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of October, 2001, James Herbert Wolfe, III, having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey for a period of three months by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated May 8, 2001; the said James Herbert Wolfe, III, having been directed on August 15, 2001, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that James Herbert Wolfe, III, is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of [112]*112three months, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
784 A.2d 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wolfe-pa-2001.