Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Wojcik

In re Wojcik

181 A.D.2d 938, 581 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3596
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Wojcik. Read the opinion of the Court — 165 A.D.2d 895 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 12, 1992·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By decision dated January 9, 1992, respondent was suspended for one year nunc pro tunc as of September 18, 1990 and until further order of the court. It was further provided that respondent would be reinstated upon his compliance with certain conditions set forth in the decision (Matter of Wojcik, 179 AD2d 868).

Respondent has now established his compliance with the conditions specified by this court. Petitioner has advised that it has no grounds upon which to object to respondent’s reinstatement. Accordingly, respondent will be reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Levine, Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent be and hereby is reinstated as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Wojcik, 181 A.D.2d 938, 581 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3596 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

181 A.D.2d 938 (In re Wojcik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Wojcik
179 A.D.2d 868 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)