In re Woitkowski

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Woitkowski

97 A.3d 1140, 219 N.J. 181

DecidedSeptember 9, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 97 A.3d 1140 (In re Woitkowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Woitkowski, 97 A.3d 1140, 219 N.J. 181 (N.J. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-308, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-14, that MATTHEW W. WOITKOWSKI of STATEN ISLAND, NEW YORK and who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1996, should be censured based on discipline imposed in the State of New York for conduct that in New Jersey constitutes violations of RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard funds), RPC 1.15(d) (recordkeeping), and RPC 1.7(b) (concurrent conflict of interest);

And MATTHEW W. WOITKOWSKI having failed to appear on the Order directing him to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MATTHEW W. WOITKOWSKI is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-308, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-14, that MATTHEW W. WOITKOWSKI of STATEN ISLAND, NEW YORK and who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1996, should be censured based on discipline imposed in the State of New York for conduct that in New Jersey constitutes violations of RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard funds), RPC 1.15(d) (recordkeeping), and RPC 1.7(b) (concurrent conflict of interest);

And MATTHEW W. WOITKOWSKI having failed to appear on the Order directing him to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MATTHEW W. WOITKOWSKI is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 A.3d 1140, 219 N.J. 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-woitkowski-nj-2014.