In re Wohl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Wohl

63 A.D.2d 718, 405 N.Y.S.2d 125, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11641

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 22, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 63 A.D.2d 718 (In re Wohl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wohl, 63 A.D.2d 718, 405 N.Y.S.2d 125, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11641 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to enforce visitation rights, the appeal is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 7, 1977, as granted petitioner additional visitation rights. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and motion remanded to the Special Term for hearing and determination in accordance herewith. Special Term granted the petitioner additional visitation privileges without first holding a hearing. Since issues concerning visitation must be decided solely on the basis of the best interests of the children, no change of the visitation provisions contained in a separation agreement should be made without a full evidentiary hearing (see Kresnicka v Kresnicka, 48 AD2d 929). Martuscello, J. P., Suozzi, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to enforce visitation rights, the appeal is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 7, 1977, as granted petitioner additional visitation rights. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and motion remanded to the Special Term for hearing and determination in accordance herewith. Special Term granted the petitioner additional visitation privileges without first holding a hearing. Since issues concerning visitation must be decided solely on the basis of the best interests of the children, no change of the visitation provisions contained in a separation agreement should be made without a full evidentiary hearing (see Kresnicka v Kresnicka, 48 AD2d 929). Martuscello, J. P., Suozzi, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 A.D.2d 718, 405 N.Y.S.2d 125, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wohl-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack