In Re Woghin

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In Re Woghin

976 A.2d 922, 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 328, 2009 WL 2252315

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 30, 2009

Docket09-BS-823

StatusPublished

This text of 976 A.2d 922 (In Re Woghin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Woghin, 976 A.2d 922, 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 328, 2009 WL 2252315 (D.C. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the affidavit of Steven M. Woghin, wherein he consents to disbarment from the Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this Court, the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility with respect *923 thereto, and the letter dated July 20, 2009, from the Office of Bar Counsel, taking no exception to the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, it is this 30th day of July, 2009

ORDERED that the said Steven M. Woghin, is hereby disbarred by consent effective forthwith. The effective date of respondent’s disbarment shall run, for reinstatement purposes, from the date respondent files his affidavit pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14(g).

The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the Court or upon written consent of the respondent.

The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving the respondent notice of the provisions of Rule XI, § 14(g), and § 16, which set forth certain rights and responsibilities of disbarred attorneys and the effect of failure to comply with these provisions,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the affidavit of Steven M. Woghin, wherein he consents to disbarment from the Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this Court, the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility with respect *923 thereto, and the letter dated July 20, 2009, from the Office of Bar Counsel, taking no exception to the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, it is this 30th day of July, 2009

ORDERED that the said Steven M. Woghin, is hereby disbarred by consent effective forthwith. The effective date of respondent’s disbarment shall run, for reinstatement purposes, from the date respondent files his affidavit pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14(g).

The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the Court or upon written consent of the respondent.

The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving the respondent notice of the provisions of Rule XI, § 14(g), and § 16, which set forth certain rights and responsibilities of disbarred attorneys and the effect of failure to comply with these provisions,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

976 A.2d 922, 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 328, 2009 WL 2252315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-woghin-dc-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack