In re Wittstein

250 A.D. 427, 294 N.Y.S. 196, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8358
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 19, 1937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who is fifty-three years of age, was admitted to the bar in 1905.

The official referee has found, and the proof justifies the finding, that respondent paid solicitors for procuring negligence cases for him. Respondent seems to have had a small practice and since 1934 he has had very few negligence cases. The official referee has recommended, and the Bar Association is in accord with the recommendation, that respondent be suspended for a period of two years.

The report of the official referee should be confirmed and respondent suspended from the practice of the law for a period of two years.

Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ.

Motion to confirm report of official referee granted and respondent suspended from the practice of the law for a period of two years.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Wittstein, 250 A.D. 427, 294 N.Y.S. 196, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8358 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

250 A.D. 427 (In re Wittstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Wittstein
257 A.D. 835 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)