In re Witt's Estate
141 N.Y.S. 179
This text of 141 N.Y.S. 179 (In re Witt's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Witt's Estate, 141 N.Y.S. 179 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1913).
Opinion
Under the provisions of section 2727, C. C. P., the petitioner is not a person entitled to compel the administrator to account. The applicant, who is but a creditor of a distributee, is not a proper party to an accounting. Matter of Redfield, 71 Hun, 344, 25 N. Y. Supp. 3; Duncan v. Guest, 5 Redf. Sur. 440.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Redfield's Estate
25 N.Y.S. 3 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
141 N.Y.S. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-witts-estate-nysurct-1913.