In re Wittig

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Wittig

688 A.2d 1171

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 22, 1997

DocketNo. 290 Disciplinary Docket, No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 688 A.2d 1171 (In re Wittig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wittig, 688 A.2d 1171 (Pa. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 22nd day of January, 1997, a Rule having been entered by this Court on December 18, 1996, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Raymond S. Wittig to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and, upon consideration of the response filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Raymond S. Wittig is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 22nd day of January, 1997, a Rule having been entered by this Court on December 18, 1996, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Raymond S. Wittig to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and, upon consideration of the response filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Raymond S. Wittig is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

688 A.2d 1171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wittig-pa-1997.