In re Wittenberg
This text of 160 F. 991 (In re Wittenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
The exceptions to the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh specifications of objection to the bankrupt’s discharge are overruled. The exceptions to the second, third, eighth, and ninth specifications are sustained, on the ground that the averments contained therein are too vague and indefinite; but the objecting creditors, or either of them, are permitted to amend these specifications on or before April 1st. If such amendments are made, and no exceptions to the specifications as amended are filed on or before April 6th, the clerk will refer all the specifications to the referee for speedy action and report thereon. If no amendments are made, the clerk will make a similar order of reference concerning the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh specifications.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
160 F. 991, 1908 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wittenberg-paed-1908.