In re Witman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Witman

805 A.2d 455, 174 N.J. 338, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1285

DecidedSeptember 19, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 805 A.2d 455 (In re Witman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Witman, 805 A.2d 455, 174 N.J. 338, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1285 (N.J. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-417, concluding that LEONARD J. WITMAN of FLORHAM PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.3(a)(5) (failure to disclose to a tribunal a material fact with knowledge that the tribunal may tend to be misled by such failure), RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice);

And the Court having determined after its review of the record that the appropriate discipline for these offenses is an admonition;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that LEONARD J. WITMAN is hereby admonished; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-417, concluding that LEONARD J. WITMAN of FLORHAM PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.3(a)(5) (failure to disclose to a tribunal a material fact with knowledge that the tribunal may tend to be misled by such failure), RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice);

And the Court having determined after its review of the record that the appropriate discipline for these offenses is an admonition;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that LEONARD J. WITMAN is hereby admonished; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

805 A.2d 455, 174 N.J. 338, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-witman-nj-2002.