In re Wishnew

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Wishnew

256 A.D. 1102, 12 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6290

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 1102 (In re Wishnew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wishnew, 256 A.D. 1102, 12 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6290 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

The motion of the petitioner is disposed of as follows: 1. Motion to amend the petition by adding the new charges set forth in the affidavit of Mr. Bruchhausen granted. 2. The charges heretofore referred to Hon. Burt Jay Humphrey, official referee, and concerning which testimony has been taken, are referred to Hon. Isaac M. Kapper, official referee, to proceed on the testimony already taken, if agreed to by the parties, or to take testimony anew if such agreement should not be made. 3. To hear the above items 1 and 2 and to report thereon, with recommendations to the court. 4. In making recommendations the official referee will take into consideration the report heretofore made by Hon. Burt Jay Humphrey, official referee, dated June 9, 1937. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ. [See 250 App. Div. 780; 253 id. 726; 254 id. 884.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The motion of the petitioner is disposed of as follows: 1. Motion to amend the petition by adding the new charges set forth in the affidavit of Mr. Bruchhausen granted. 2. The charges heretofore referred to Hon. Burt Jay Humphrey, official referee, and concerning which testimony has been taken, are referred to Hon. Isaac M. Kapper, official referee, to proceed on the testimony already taken, if agreed to by the parties, or to take testimony anew if such agreement should not be made. 3. To hear the above items 1 and 2 and to report thereon, with recommendations to the court. 4. In making recommendations the official referee will take into consideration the report heretofore made by Hon. Burt Jay Humphrey, official referee, dated June 9, 1937. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ. [See 250 App. Div. 780; 253 id. 726; 254 id. 884.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 1102, 12 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wishnew-nyappdiv-1939.