In re Wisher

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Wisher

880 A.2d 1218

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 3, 2005

DocketNo. 1027 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 880 A.2d 1218 (In re Wisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wisher, 880 A.2d 1218 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2005, a Rule having been entered by this Court on June 2, 2005, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Ashly Mae Wisher to show cause why she should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Ashly Mae Wisher is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule [1219]*1219214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and she shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2005, a Rule having been entered by this Court on June 2, 2005, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Ashly Mae Wisher to show cause why she should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Ashly Mae Wisher is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule [1219]*1219214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and she shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

880 A.2d 1218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wisher-pa-2005.