In Re Wisehart

New York Court of Appeals

In Re Wisehart

759 N.E.2d 369, 96 N.Y.2d 935, 733 N.Y.S.2d 370, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3175

DecidedSeptember 20, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 759 N.E.2d 369 (In Re Wisehart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Wisehart, 759 N.E.2d 369, 96 N.Y.2d 935, 733 N.Y.S.2d 370, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3175 (N.Y. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken from the Appellate Division order of suspension, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (see, CPLR 5601); insofar as taken from the order of an individual justice *936 of the Appellate Division, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no appeal lies from such order (see, NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5601); insofar as taken from the Appellate Division order denying leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the order of an individual justice of the Appellate Division, dismissed upon the ground that no appeal lies from such order (see, NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5602); insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judge Ciparick taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken from the Appellate Division order of suspension, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (see, CPLR 5601); insofar as taken from the order of an individual justice *936 of the Appellate Division, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no appeal lies from such order (see, NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5601); insofar as taken from the Appellate Division order denying leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the order of an individual justice of the Appellate Division, dismissed upon the ground that no appeal lies from such order (see, NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5602); insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judge Ciparick taking no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

759 N.E.2d 369, 96 N.Y.2d 935, 733 N.Y.S.2d 370, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wisehart-ny-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack