In re Wise

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Wise

653 A.2d 567, 139 N.J. 268

DecidedFebruary 2, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 653 A.2d 567 (In re Wise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wise, 653 A.2d 567, 139 N.J. 268 (N.J. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that JOHN F. WISE of SOUTH ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, be publicly reprimanded for violating the requirements of Rule 1:21-6 and RPC 1.15 by failing to maintain proper attorney books and records, with the result that client funds were negligently invaded, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and JOHN F. WISE is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that JOHN F. WISE of SOUTH ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, be publicly reprimanded for violating the requirements of Rule 1:21-6 and RPC 1.15 by failing to maintain proper attorney books and records, with the result that client funds were negligently invaded, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and JOHN F. WISE is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

653 A.2d 567, 139 N.J. 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wise-nj-1995.