In re Winston

138 A.3d 543, 225 N.J. 369, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 576
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 27, 2016
StatusPublished

This text of 138 A.3d 543 (In re Winston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Winston, 138 A.3d 543, 225 N.J. 369, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 576 (N.J. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented on the motion for reinstatement to practice law filed by ERIC M. WINSTON of MANALAPAN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2002, [370]*370and who was temporarily suspended from the practice of law pursuant to Rule l:20-17(e)(i) effective May 1, 2015, by Order filed March 31, 2015;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having reported to the Court that respondent has paid the outstanding administrative costs and interest owed;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and ERIC M. WINSTON is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 A.3d 543, 225 N.J. 369, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-winston-nj-2016.