Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Winsor

In re Winsor

192 A.D.2d 867, 596 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3795
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1993·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By decision dated May 4, 1992, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of six months, effective immediately (see, Matter of Winsor, 183 AD2d 936). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of respondent’s application indicates that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (b) (22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]) of this Court’s rules regarding reinstatement. Petitioner has advised that it has no grounds upon which to object to respondent’s application. Accordingly, re[868]*868spondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Weiss, P. J., Yesawich Jr., Crew III, Casey and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Winsor, 192 A.D.2d 867, 596 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3795 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

192 A.D.2d 867 (In re Winsor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Winsor
84 A.D.3d 1585 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
In re Reilly
210 A.D.2d 696 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)