In re Winsor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Winsor

192 A.D.2d 867, 596 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3795

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 192 A.D.2d 867 (In re Winsor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Winsor, 192 A.D.2d 867, 596 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3795 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By decision dated May 4, 1992, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of six months, effective immediately (see, Matter of Winsor, 183 AD2d 936). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of respondent’s application indicates that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (b) (22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]) of this Court’s rules regarding reinstatement. Petitioner has advised that it has no grounds upon which to object to respondent’s application. Accordingly, re[868]*868spondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Weiss, P. J., Yesawich Jr., Crew III, Casey and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

By decision dated May 4, 1992, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of six months, effective immediately (see, Matter of Winsor, 183 AD2d 936). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of respondent’s application indicates that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (b) (22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]) of this Court’s rules regarding reinstatement. Petitioner has advised that it has no grounds upon which to object to respondent’s application. Accordingly, re[868]*868spondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Weiss, P. J., Yesawich Jr., Crew III, Casey and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A.D.2d 867, 596 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-winsor-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack