In Re Winsberg

17 So. 3d 360, 2009 La. LEXIS 2451, 2009 WL 2973491
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 18, 2009·No. 2009-B-1389·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM. *

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent faded to act with reasonable diligence in a collection matter. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted, and that Michael Winsberg, Louisiana Bar Roll number 19444, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

*

Judge Benjamin Jones, of the Fourth Judicial District Court, assigned as Justice Pro Tem-pore, participating in the decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Winsberg, 17 So. 3d 360, 2009 La. LEXIS 2451, 2009 WL 2973491 (La. 2009).

17 So. 3d 360 (In Re Winsberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.