In re Winkler

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Winkler

175 N.J. 438, 815 N.J. 953

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 13, 2003·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 02-308, concluding that MAURY R. WINKLER of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(negligent misappropriation and commingling of funds), RPC 1.15(d), and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping deficiencies), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MAURY R. WINKLER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 02-308, concluding that MAURY R. WINKLER of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(negligent misappropriation and commingling of funds), RPC 1.15(d), and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping deficiencies), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MAURY R. WINKLER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Winkler, 175 N.J. 438, 815 N.J. 953 (N.J. 2003).

Pincite

175 N.J. 438 (In re Winkler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.