In re Wimberly

628 S.E.2d 887, 368 S.C. 177, 2006 S.C. LEXIS 105
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Wimberly. Read the opinion of the Court — 356 S.C. 436
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 27, 2006·Published

Opinion

ORDER

On December 1, 2003, petitioner was suspended from the practice of law for twelve (12) months. In the Matter of [178]*178Wimberly, 356 S.C. 436, 590 S.E.2d 335 (2003). Petitioner has filed a Petition for Reinstatement pursuant to Rule 33, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

Petitioner’s Petition for Reinstatement is hereby granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Wimberly, 628 S.E.2d 887, 368 S.C. 177, 2006 S.C. LEXIS 105 (S.C. 2006).

628 S.E.2d 887 (In re Wimberly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Wimberly
590 S.E.2d 335 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2003)