In re Wimberly

628 S.E.2d 887, 368 S.C. 177, 2006 S.C. LEXIS 105
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 27, 2006
StatusPublished

This text of 628 S.E.2d 887 (In re Wimberly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Wimberly, 628 S.E.2d 887, 368 S.C. 177, 2006 S.C. LEXIS 105 (S.C. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

On December 1, 2003, petitioner was suspended from the practice of law for twelve (12) months. In the Matter of [178]*178Wimberly, 356 S.C. 436, 590 S.E.2d 335 (2003). Petitioner has filed a Petition for Reinstatement pursuant to Rule 33, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

Petitioner’s Petition for Reinstatement is hereby granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Wimberly
590 S.E.2d 335 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
628 S.E.2d 887, 368 S.C. 177, 2006 S.C. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wimberly-sc-2006.