In Re: Wilson v.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 21, 2009·No. 08-2015·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2015

In re: STEVEN C. WILSON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:08-ct-03053-BO)

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 21, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven C. Wilson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Steven C. Wilson petitions for a writ of mandamus,

alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. He seeks an order from this

court directing the district court to act. We find there has

been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny

the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Wilson v., (4th Cir. 2009).

In Re: Wilson v. (In Re: Wilson v.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related