In re Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Wilson

208 A.D.2d 55, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2094

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 208 A.D.2d 55 (In re Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wilson, 208 A.D.2d 55, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2094 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on November 2, 1978 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. In his affidavit he states that he is currently practicing law in Scranton, Pennsylvania, that he has no intention of practicing law in New York State, and that he is resigning [56]*56because it has become increasingly burdensome to pay the required attorney registration fees. There are no complaints pending against him.

We grant the application and direct that his name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted, and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on November 2, 1978 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. In his affidavit he states that he is currently practicing law in Scranton, Pennsylvania, that he has no intention of practicing law in New York State, and that he is resigning [56]*56because it has become increasingly burdensome to pay the required attorney registration fees. There are no complaints pending against him.

We grant the application and direct that his name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted, and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 A.D.2d 55, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wilson-nyappdiv-1995.