In re Wilson

241 A.D. 691
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Wilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 248 A.D. 388

Opinion

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county of October 6, 1932, in so far as it dismisses appellant’s demand against the surety for $3,060 and interest, and in so far as it surcharges appellant in that sum, reversed on the law and the facts, with costs to appellant, payable by the surety, and a decree is directed providing that the surety pay to the appellant the sum of $3,060, with interest from April 8, 1929, and that the surcharge of the appellant be deleted. The payment to the surety was not made under a mistake of law, but a mistake of fact on the part of appellant, induced by undue influence on the part of the surety. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Wilson, 241 A.D. 691 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

241 A.D. 691 (In re Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.