In re Wilson
This text of 241 A.D. 691 (In re Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county of October 6, 1932, in so far as it dismisses appellant’s demand against the surety for $3,060 and interest, and in so far as it surcharges appellant in that sum, reversed on the law and the facts, with costs to appellant, payable by the surety, and a decree is directed providing that the surety pay to the appellant the sum of $3,060, with interest from April 8, 1929, and that the surcharge of the appellant be deleted. The payment to the surety was not made under a mistake of law, but a mistake of fact on the part of appellant, induced by undue influence on the part of the surety. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D. 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wilson-nyappdiv-1934.