in Re Wilma Reynolds
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 4, 2011.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-11-00002-CV
IN RE WILMA REYNOLDS, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
300th District Court
Brazoria County, Texas
Trial Court No. 48170
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On January 3, 2011, relator Wilma Reynolds filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator complains that respondent, the Honorable James Robertson, an associate judge for the 300th District Court of Brazoria County, abused his discretion in quashing discovery subpoenas issued in a modification proceeding pending in cause number 48170. Relator also filed an emergency motion seeking a stay of hearings scheduled for January 5, 2011, and February 2, 2011. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(a). We deny the motion.
We do not have mandamus jurisdiction over an associate judge. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221(b) (providing for mandamus jurisdiction over a judge of a district or county court); In re Walker, No. 01-08-00253-CV, 2008 WL 1830400 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 18, 2008, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); see also In re Walker, 265 S.W.3d 545, 547 n. 8 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Frost and Christopher.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Wilma Reynolds (in Re Wilma Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.