In Re Wilma Reynolds and Carl Gordon v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Wilma Reynolds and Carl Gordon v. the State of Texas (In Re Wilma Reynolds and Carl Gordon v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed February 1, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-24-00008-CV
IN RE WILMA REYNOLDS AND CARL GORDON, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 152nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-83411
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On Thursday, January 4, 2024, relators Wilma Reynolds and Carl Gordon filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to compel the Honorable Robert Schaffer, presiding judge of the 152nd District Court of Harris County, to vacate his order (1) denying relator’s motion to abate and (2) granting real-party-interest’s motion to compel.
Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Spain and Poissant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Wilma Reynolds and Carl Gordon v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wilma-reynolds-and-carl-gordon-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.