In Re Wilma Reynolds and Carl Gordon v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Wilma Reynolds and Carl Gordon v. the State of Texas (In Re Wilma Reynolds and Carl Gordon v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 31, 2023.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-23-00731-CV
IN RE WILMA REYNOLDS AND CARL GORDON, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 300th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 48170
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 5, 2023, relators Wilma Reynolds and Carl Gordon filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to compel the Honorable C.G. Dibrell, visiting judge of the 300th District Court of Brazoria County, to vacate his September 11, 2023 order dismissing the underlying case and October 6, 2023 order granting real parties in interest’s request for attorney’s fees. Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny relators’ amended motion for emergency stay.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Poissant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Wilma Reynolds and Carl Gordon v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wilma-reynolds-and-carl-gordon-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.