in Re: Willis Floyd Wiley
This text of in Re: Willis Floyd Wiley (in Re: Willis Floyd Wiley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 12-06-00045-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
§
IN RE: WILLIS FLOYD WILEY, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
RELATOR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Willis Floyd Wiley seeks a writ of mandamus requiring the Honorable James N. Parsons, III, Judge of the 3rd Judicial District Court, Anderson County, Texas, to dismiss cause number 28,322 in which Wiley was reindicted for possession of a prohibited substance in a penal institution. Based on the record before us, we conclude that Wiley has not shown himself entitled to the relief requested. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); State ex rel. Hill v. Fifth Court of Appeals, 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). According, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Wiley’s motion that this Court request any portions of the trial court record necessary for review of his petition is also denied.
DIANE DeVASTO
Justice
Opinion delivered February 28, 2006.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J. and DeVasto, J.
(PUBLISH)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Willis Floyd Wiley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-willis-floyd-wiley-texapp-2006.