in Re Willie Frank Marshall
This text of in Re Willie Frank Marshall (in Re Willie Frank Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Alma L. López, Justice
Paul W. Green, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 6, 2001
DENIED
On May 22, 2001, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The petition does not comply with Rule 52 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure because it does not contain: (1) in the appendix, a certified or sworn copy of the order complained of, or any other document showing the matter complained of, Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j)(1)(A); or (2) a certified or sworn copy of every document material to relator's claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding, Tex.
R. App. P. 52.7(a)(1). This court has determined that the relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, the petition is DENIED, without prejudice. Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Willie Frank Marshall, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-willie-frank-marshall-texapp-2001.