In re Williamson

349 S.E.2d 746, 256 Ga. 415, 1986 Ga. LEXIS 921
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 13, 1986
DocketSupreme Court Disciplinary No. 419
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 349 S.E.2d 746 (In re Williamson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Williamson, 349 S.E.2d 746, 256 Ga. 415, 1986 Ga. LEXIS 921 (Ga. 1986).

Opinion

Per curiam.

O. H. Williamson was charged with violating several disciplinary standards and admitted a violation of Standard 23 of Bar Rule 4-102 which deals with one’s failure to return unearned fees paid in advance. Based upon his admission of the one violation above, he requests voluntary discipline in the form of a private reprimand. In answer to this request, on May 10, 1985, the State Bar presented evidence of a private reprimand which petitioner had previously received in an unrelated disciplinary proceeding for his violation of Standards 4 and 44 of Bar Rule 4-102.

On December 12, 1985, the State Bar filed its second amended response, matters in aggravation of discipline requested by petitioner, and evidence that he had received a form letter of admonition in another unrelated disciplinary matter in which petitioner had violated Standards 44 and 68 of Bar Rule 4-102. The Special Master, in view of these facts, stated that a greater imposition of punishment than that requested by petitioner is justified. Based upon the fact that petitioner has been disciplined in two cases, prior to this case, for misconduct similar to that found in the present case, the State Disciplinary Board recommends that petitioner be disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Georgia pursuant to Bar Rule 4-103.

In lieu of this recommendation this Court suspends petitioner’s rights to practice law for one year from the date of this order, after which he is automatically reinstated to the practice of law in this State provided he has made restitution of the balance due in the fee matter in this case.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Williamson
357 S.E.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
349 S.E.2d 746, 256 Ga. 415, 1986 Ga. LEXIS 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-williamson-ga-1986.