In re Williams Street

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Williams Street

43 A. 326, 191 Pa. 472, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 842

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 15, 1899

DocketAppeal, No. 140

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 43 A. 326 (In re Williams Street) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Williams Street, 43 A. 326, 191 Pa. 472, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 842 (Pa. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are all of opinion that the sixth section of the Act of May 16,1891, P. L. 75, was correctly construed by the learned judge of the court below, and hence there was no error in striking off the appeal because it was not taken and filed within the time prescribed by said act. To have held otherwise would have been an attempted judicial amendment of the act in question.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We are all of opinion that the sixth section of the Act of May 16,1891, P. L. 75, was correctly construed by the learned judge of the court below, and hence there was no error in striking off the appeal because it was not taken and filed within the time prescribed by said act. To have held otherwise would have been an attempted judicial amendment of the act in question.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A. 326, 191 Pa. 472, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-williams-street-pa-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack