In re Williams Street

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Williams Street

43 A. 326, 191 Pa. 472, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 842

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 15, 1899·No. Appeal, No. 140·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are all of opinion that the sixth section of the Act of May 16,1891, P. L. 75, was correctly construed by the learned judge of the court below, and hence there was no error in striking off the appeal because it was not taken and filed within the time prescribed by said act. To have held otherwise would have been an attempted judicial amendment of the act in question.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We are all of opinion that the sixth section of the Act of May 16,1891, P. L. 75, was correctly construed by the learned judge of the court below, and hence there was no error in striking off the appeal because it was not taken and filed within the time prescribed by said act. To have held otherwise would have been an attempted judicial amendment of the act in question.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

In re Williams Street, 43 A. 326, 191 Pa. 472, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 842 (Pa. 1899).

Pincite

43 A. 326 (In re Williams Street) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related