In re Williams

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Williams

439 S.E.2d 254, 312 S.C. 51, 1993 S.C. LEXIS 244

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided December 10, 1993·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent is an attorney licensed to practice law in South Carolina. She petitions to be transferred to the disability inactive status under Paragraph 19, Rule 413, SCACR.

[52] IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and Respondent is transferred to disability inactive status until petition of Respondent for reinstatement and until further Order of this Court.

/s/ David W. Harwell. C.J. /s/ A. Lee Chandler. J. /s/ Ernest A. Finney. Jr., J. /s/ Jean H. Toal. J. /s/ James E. Moore. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Respondent is an attorney licensed to practice law in South Carolina. She petitions to be transferred to the disability inactive status under Paragraph 19, Rule 413, SCACR.

[52] IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and Respondent is transferred to disability inactive status until petition of Respondent for reinstatement and until further Order of this Court.

/s/ David W. Harwell. C.J. /s/ A. Lee Chandler. J. /s/ Ernest A. Finney. Jr., J. /s/ Jean H. Toal. J. /s/ James E. Moore. J.

In re Williams, 439 S.E.2d 254, 312 S.C. 51, 1993 S.C. LEXIS 244 (S.C. 1993).

Pincite

439 S.E.2d 254 (In re Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.