In re Williams

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Williams

439 S.E.2d 254, 312 S.C. 51, 1993 S.C. LEXIS 244

DecidedDecember 10, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 439 S.E.2d 254 (In re Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Williams, 439 S.E.2d 254, 312 S.C. 51, 1993 S.C. LEXIS 244 (S.C. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent is an attorney licensed to practice law in South Carolina. She petitions to be transferred to the disability inactive status under Paragraph 19, Rule 413, SCACR.

[52]*52IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and Respondent is transferred to disability inactive status until petition of Respondent for reinstatement and until further Order of this Court.

/s/ David W. Harwell. C.J. /s/ A. Lee Chandler. J. /s/ Ernest A. Finney. Jr., J. /s/ Jean H. Toal. J. /s/ James E. Moore. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Respondent is an attorney licensed to practice law in South Carolina. She petitions to be transferred to the disability inactive status under Paragraph 19, Rule 413, SCACR.

[52]*52IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and Respondent is transferred to disability inactive status until petition of Respondent for reinstatement and until further Order of this Court.

/s/ David W. Harwell. C.J. /s/ A. Lee Chandler. J. /s/ Ernest A. Finney. Jr., J. /s/ Jean H. Toal. J. /s/ James E. Moore. J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

439 S.E.2d 254, 312 S.C. 51, 1993 S.C. LEXIS 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-williams-sc-1993.