In re Williams

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Williams

795 N.E.2d 680, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1540

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 10, 2003·No. 2003-1466·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Geauga App. Nos. 2003-G-2498 and 2003-G-2499, 2003-0hio-3550. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry:

“Whether children who are the subject of a motion to terminate parental rights are ‘parties’ to that proceeding for the purposes of Juv.R. 4(A) and R.C. 2151.352, requiring the appointment of counsel.”

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

The conflict case is In re Alfrey, 2d Dist. No. 01CA0083, 2003-0hio-608, 2003 WL 262587.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Geauga App. Nos. 2003-G-2498 and 2003-G-2499, 2003-0hio-3550. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry:

“Whether children who are the subject of a motion to terminate parental rights are ‘parties’ to that proceeding for the purposes of Juv.R. 4(A) and R.C. 2151.352, requiring the appointment of counsel.”

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

The conflict case is In re Alfrey, 2d Dist. No. 01CA0083, 2003-0hio-608, 2003 WL 262587.

In re Williams, 795 N.E.2d 680, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1540 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

795 N.E.2d 680 (In re Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related