In re Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Williams

203 A.D.2d 197, 614 N.Y.S.2d 103, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4675

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 A.D.2d 374 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 26, 1994·Published

Opinion

—Application to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York is denied, the crime of which respondent has been convicted is deemed a "serious crime”, and the matter referred to the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for a hearing on the issue of the appropriate sanction, and pending receipt of the report, the order of suspension shall remain in full force and effect. No opinion. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Application to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York is denied, the crime of which respondent has been convicted is deemed a "serious crime”, and the matter referred to the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for a hearing on the issue of the appropriate sanction, and pending receipt of the report, the order of suspension shall remain in full force and effect. No opinion. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.

In re Williams, 203 A.D.2d 197, 614 N.Y.S.2d 103, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

203 A.D.2d 197 (In re Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.