In re Williams

109 So. 3d 349, 2013 WL 1091297, 2013 La. LEXIS 487
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 La. LEXIS 2
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 15, 2013·No. No. 2013-B-0417·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent failed to provide competent representation to a client, neglected a legal matter, and failed to adequately communicate with a client. Following the institution of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

[350]*350IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Lenise Rochelle Williams, Louisiana Bar Roll number 29706, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Williams, 109 So. 3d 349, 2013 WL 1091297, 2013 La. LEXIS 487 (La. 2013).

109 So. 3d 349 (In re Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.