In re Williams

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Williams

925 So. 2d 1217, 2006 La. LEXIS 999, 2006 WL 1097488

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 La. LEXIS 1088 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 24, 2006·No. No. 2006-OB-0236·Published

Opinion

In re Disciplinary Board; — Other; Applying for Findings and Recommendations (Readmission) Office of Disciplinary Board, No. 05-DB-012.

Readmission denied. Petitioner may not reapply for readmission until restitution or good faith efforts at restitution have been made, but in no event until one year has passed from the date of this judgment. Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 24(1).

VICTORY, J., would not allow reapplication for a period of three years. WEIMER, J., would not allow reapplication for a period of two years.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Disciplinary Board; — Other; Applying for Findings and Recommendations (Readmission) Office of Disciplinary Board, No. 05-DB-012.

Readmission denied. Petitioner may not reapply for readmission until restitution or good faith efforts at restitution have been made, but in no event until one year has passed from the date of this judgment. Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 24(1).

VICTORY, J., would not allow reapplication for a period of three years. WEIMER, J., would not allow reapplication for a period of two years.

In re Williams, 925 So. 2d 1217, 2006 La. LEXIS 999, 2006 WL 1097488 (La. 2006).

Pincite

925 So. 2d 1217 (In re Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.